Case No. 10-14

Mackenzie Cadenhead & Daniel J. Buckley
44 Oakdale Drive
(Deferred from June Meeting)
Relief from the strict application of Section 295-20.F and 295-68.F.(1)(a) of the Village Code for a
single story addition to their home on a corner lot at 44 Oakdale Avenue.
Said property is in R-10 Zoning District and is also known as SBL:4.20-16-1 on the Village tax Maps.
Variances sought are as follows:
1. Front Yard on Oakdale Avenue: Proposed for the addition – 23.29 ft.; Required min. - 30 ft.
{295-68.F.(1)(a)}
2. Side Yard on Hollywood Drive: Proposed for the addition – 13.46 ft.; Required min. for a
corner lot – 30 ft. {295-55.A and 295-68.F.(1)(a)}

Case No. 11-14

Jean-Pierre Boudrias & Phaong Sara Ho
21 Calumet Avenue
(Deferred from June Meeting)
Relief from the strict application of Section 295-55.A and 295-68.F.(1)(c) and 295-68.F.(1)(d) of the
Village Code for the additions and alterations to their home at 21 Calumet Avenue.
Said property is in R-10 Zoning District and is also known as SBL: 4.40-29-3 on the Village tax Maps.
Variances sought are as follows:
1. Extension of a non-conformity - Side Yard: Min. on one side and total of two sides:
Existing and proposed – 4.5 ft. and 29.1 ft.; Required min. - 12 ft. and 30 ft. {295-55.A and 295-68.F.
(1)(c)}
2. Building Height – Number of stories: Proposed – Addition of a third story on an existing
two story portion of the house; Permitted max.: – 2 ½ stories {295-68.F.(1)(d)}

Case No. 12-14

Kristin & Daniel Wyatt
7 Edmarth Place
(May be Deferred Pending Action by Planning Board)
Relief from the strict application of code sections 295-55.A.; 295-70.E.(3)(a)[1] & [2] and 295-70.E.(1)
(c) as for the addition and alterations to their home at 7 Edmarth Place.
Said property is located in the R2 zoning district and is known as SBL: 4.30-20-21 on the Village Tax
Maps.
Variances sought are as follows:
1. Total of two side yards: Proposed for the addition – 19.67 ft;. Required min. 20 ft. {295-
70.E.(1)(c)}
2. Extension of existing non-conformity - Lot Coverage: Existing – 37.18%; Proposed –
37.75%; Permitted max. – 30% {295-55.A.and 295-70.E.(3)(a)[1]}
3. Extension of existing non-conformity - Development Coverage: Existing – 48.08%;
Proposed – 49.37%; Permitted max. – 40% {295-55.A.and 95-70.E.(3)(a)[2]}

Approval of Minutes

Approval of Minutes
Regular Meeting, June 19, 2014