December 5, 2019 Zoning Board Meeting
»
Call to Order - A Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals will be held on Thursday, December 5, 2019 at 8:00 P.M., in the Meeting Room, Municipal Building, 7 Maple Avenue, Hastings-on-Hudson, New York.
Call to Order
A Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals will be held on Thursday, December 5, 2019 at 8:00 P.M., in the Meeting Room, Municipal Building, 7 Maple Avenue, Hastings-on-Hudson, New York.»
Case No. 19-19 - Andrew Tucker & Rafaela De La Huerta
10 Maple Lane
Relief from the strict application of the Village Code Sections 295-70E.2.a&c with 295-55A, 295-70E.3.b and 295-20B.6 for an addition of a roof dormer & extension of an existing 1st floor rear deck & stairs on their two-family dwelling located at 10 Maple Lane. Said property is located in the 2R Zoning District and is known as SBL: 4.30-21-6 on the Village Tax Maps.
Non-conformity details are as follows:
1. Prohibition against extension of nonconformity – with relation to front- and side-yard setbacks for the roof dormer and 1st floor rear deck. {295-55A}
2. Front-yard setback: Existing – 5.6 ft.; Proposed – 23.4 ft.; Required – 30 ft. {295-70E.2.a & 295-55A}; Variance required – 6.6 ft.
3. Side-yard setbacks to dormer: Each yard/total of both – Existing: side 1 – 1.9 ft./side 2 – 2.7 ft./Both – 4.6 ft.; Proposed: side 1 – 1.9 ft./side 2 – NA/Both – 4.6 ft.; Required: side 1 – 12 ft./side 2 – 18 ft./Both – 30 ft.{295-70E.2.c & 295-55A}; Variance required – side 1 – 16.1 ft./side 2 – NA/Both – 25.4 ft.
4. Lot Coverage: Existing – 44.9%; Proposed – 48%; Required – 25% max {295-70E.3.b}; Variance required – 23%
5. Deck projection into required yard side 1/side 2: Existing side 1 – 6.5 ft./side 2 – 0 ft.; Proposed side 1 – 8.6 ft. /side 2 – 8.5 ft.; Required max – 6 ft. each {295-20B.6 & 295-55A}; Variance required side 1 – 2.6 ft./side 2 – 2.5 ft.
Case No. 19-19
Andrew Tucker & Rafaela De La Huerta10 Maple Lane
Relief from the strict application of the Village Code Sections 295-70E.2.a&c with 295-55A, 295-70E.3.b and 295-20B.6 for an addition of a roof dormer & extension of an existing 1st floor rear deck & stairs on their two-family dwelling located at 10 Maple Lane. Said property is located in the 2R Zoning District and is known as SBL: 4.30-21-6 on the Village Tax Maps.
Non-conformity details are as follows:
1. Prohibition against extension of nonconformity – with relation to front- and side-yard setbacks for the roof dormer and 1st floor rear deck. {295-55A}
2. Front-yard setback: Existing – 5.6 ft.; Proposed – 23.4 ft.; Required – 30 ft. {295-70E.2.a & 295-55A}; Variance required – 6.6 ft.
3. Side-yard setbacks to dormer: Each yard/total of both – Existing: side 1 – 1.9 ft./side 2 – 2.7 ft./Both – 4.6 ft.; Proposed: side 1 – 1.9 ft./side 2 – NA/Both – 4.6 ft.; Required: side 1 – 12 ft./side 2 – 18 ft./Both – 30 ft.{295-70E.2.c & 295-55A}; Variance required – side 1 – 16.1 ft./side 2 – NA/Both – 25.4 ft.
4. Lot Coverage: Existing – 44.9%; Proposed – 48%; Required – 25% max {295-70E.3.b}; Variance required – 23%
5. Deck projection into required yard side 1/side 2: Existing side 1 – 6.5 ft./side 2 – 0 ft.; Proposed side 1 – 8.6 ft. /side 2 – 8.5 ft.; Required max – 6 ft. each {295-20B.6 & 295-55A}; Variance required side 1 – 2.6 ft./side 2 – 2.5 ft.
»
Case No. 20-19 - Peter, Stephen & Roman Pryschlak
60 Maple Avenue
Relief from the strict application of the Village Code Sections 295-70D, 295-70E.2.a,b&c, 295-70E.3.b and 295-36 for the documentation of the previous conversion of a one-family dwelling to a two-family dwelling and the documentation of the previous removal, rebuilding & extension of the existing garage and non-conforming off-street parking on their dwelling located at 60 Maple Avenue. Said property is located in the 2R Zoning District and is known as SBL: 4.30-22-14 on the Village Tax Maps.
Non-conformity details are as follows:
1. Lot size & width for a two family in a 2R: Existing – 7500 sq. ft./75 ft. wide; Proposed – 7500 sq. ft/75 ft. wide; Required – 10,000 sq. ft./100 ft. wide {295-70D}; Variance required – 2500 sq. ft./ 25 ft. width
2. Front yard setback: Existing 16.75 ft.; Proposed 16.75 ft.; Required 30 ft. {295-70E.2.a }; Variance required – 13.25 ft.
3. Side yard setback: Side 1 – Existing: Side 1 – 7.66 ft.; Proposed: Side 1 – 7.66 ft.; Required: Side 1 – 12 ft. {295-70E.2.c}; Variance required: Side 1 – 4.34 ft.
4. Lot Coverage: Existing – 29.48%; Proposed – 29.48%; Required – 25% max {295-70E.3.b}; Variance required – 4.48%
5. Rear yard to accessory structure: Existing – .89 ft.; Proposed – .89 ft.; Required – 8 ft. {295-70E.2.b}; Variance required – 7.11 ft.
6. Side Yard to accessory structure: Existing – 3.75 ft.; Proposed – 3.75 ft.; Required – 8 ft. {295-70E.2.c}; Variance required – 4.25 ft.
7. Required off-street parking: Existing – 2 parking spots; Proposed – 2 parking spots; Required – 4 parking spots {295-36}; Variance required – 2 parking spots.
Case No. 20-19
Peter, Stephen & Roman Pryschlak60 Maple Avenue
Relief from the strict application of the Village Code Sections 295-70D, 295-70E.2.a,b&c, 295-70E.3.b and 295-36 for the documentation of the previous conversion of a one-family dwelling to a two-family dwelling and the documentation of the previous removal, rebuilding & extension of the existing garage and non-conforming off-street parking on their dwelling located at 60 Maple Avenue. Said property is located in the 2R Zoning District and is known as SBL: 4.30-22-14 on the Village Tax Maps.
Non-conformity details are as follows:
1. Lot size & width for a two family in a 2R: Existing – 7500 sq. ft./75 ft. wide; Proposed – 7500 sq. ft/75 ft. wide; Required – 10,000 sq. ft./100 ft. wide {295-70D}; Variance required – 2500 sq. ft./ 25 ft. width
2. Front yard setback: Existing 16.75 ft.; Proposed 16.75 ft.; Required 30 ft. {295-70E.2.a }; Variance required – 13.25 ft.
3. Side yard setback: Side 1 – Existing: Side 1 – 7.66 ft.; Proposed: Side 1 – 7.66 ft.; Required: Side 1 – 12 ft. {295-70E.2.c}; Variance required: Side 1 – 4.34 ft.
4. Lot Coverage: Existing – 29.48%; Proposed – 29.48%; Required – 25% max {295-70E.3.b}; Variance required – 4.48%
5. Rear yard to accessory structure: Existing – .89 ft.; Proposed – .89 ft.; Required – 8 ft. {295-70E.2.b}; Variance required – 7.11 ft.
6. Side Yard to accessory structure: Existing – 3.75 ft.; Proposed – 3.75 ft.; Required – 8 ft. {295-70E.2.c}; Variance required – 4.25 ft.
7. Required off-street parking: Existing – 2 parking spots; Proposed – 2 parking spots; Required – 4 parking spots {295-36}; Variance required – 2 parking spots.
»
Case No. 21-19 - Marek Fuchs & Lorraine Walsh
22 Elm Place
Relief from the strict application of the Village Code Sections 295-69F.1.b&c & 295-69F.2.a.1&2 for the addition of a rear porch and pergola and to replace an existing non-conforming garage with a storage shed in the same basic location at their single-family dwelling located at 22 Elm Place. Said property is located in the R-7.5 Zoning District and is known as SBL: 4.40-27-38 on the Village tax maps.
Non-conformity details are as follows:
1. Side yard setbacks to Rear Porch & Pergola: Each yard/total of both: Existing – side 1 – 8.66 ft./side 2 – 2.66 ft./ Both – 11.33 ft.; Proposed – side 1 – 6.83 ft./side 2 – 2.42 ft./Both – 9.25 ft.; Required – side 1 – 8 ft./side 2 – 12 ft./Both – 20 ft. {295-69F.1.c}; Variance required – side 1 – 1.17 ft./side 2 – 9.58 ft./Both – 10.75 ft.
2. Building Coverage: Existing – 30.26%; Proposed – 41.31%; Required – 30% max {295-69F.2.a.1}; Variance required – 11.31%
3. Development Coverage: Existing – 45.23%; Proposed – 49.94%; Required – 40% max {295-69F.2.a.2}; Variance required – 9.94%
4. Rear yard to accessory structure: Existing – .6 ft.; Proposed – 1.5 ft.; Required – 8 ft. {295-69F.1.b}; Variance required – 6.5 ft.
5. Side Yard to accessory structure: Existing – 2.33 ft.; Proposed – 1.5 ft.; Required – 8 ft. {295-69F.1.c}; Variance required – 6.5 ft.
Case No. 21-19
Marek Fuchs & Lorraine Walsh22 Elm Place
Relief from the strict application of the Village Code Sections 295-69F.1.b&c & 295-69F.2.a.1&2 for the addition of a rear porch and pergola and to replace an existing non-conforming garage with a storage shed in the same basic location at their single-family dwelling located at 22 Elm Place. Said property is located in the R-7.5 Zoning District and is known as SBL: 4.40-27-38 on the Village tax maps.
Non-conformity details are as follows:
1. Side yard setbacks to Rear Porch & Pergola: Each yard/total of both: Existing – side 1 – 8.66 ft./side 2 – 2.66 ft./ Both – 11.33 ft.; Proposed – side 1 – 6.83 ft./side 2 – 2.42 ft./Both – 9.25 ft.; Required – side 1 – 8 ft./side 2 – 12 ft./Both – 20 ft. {295-69F.1.c}; Variance required – side 1 – 1.17 ft./side 2 – 9.58 ft./Both – 10.75 ft.
2. Building Coverage: Existing – 30.26%; Proposed – 41.31%; Required – 30% max {295-69F.2.a.1}; Variance required – 11.31%
3. Development Coverage: Existing – 45.23%; Proposed – 49.94%; Required – 40% max {295-69F.2.a.2}; Variance required – 9.94%
4. Rear yard to accessory structure: Existing – .6 ft.; Proposed – 1.5 ft.; Required – 8 ft. {295-69F.1.b}; Variance required – 6.5 ft.
5. Side Yard to accessory structure: Existing – 2.33 ft.; Proposed – 1.5 ft.; Required – 8 ft. {295-69F.1.c}; Variance required – 6.5 ft.
»
Case No. 22-19 - Ken Baum & Nicole Masson
15 Minturn Street
Relief from the strict application of the Village Code Section 295-20C.2 for the construction of a new year patio at their home at 15 Minturn Street. Said property is in R-10 Zoning District and is also known as SBL: 4.20-10-10 on the Village Tax Maps.
Variance is sought for Paving in a required yard:
1. Paving in a required yard: Existing Deck – 250 sq. ft.; Proposed Patio – 650 sq. ft.; Required Max. – none allowed. {295-20C.2}; Variance required – 650 sq.ft.
Case No. 22-19
Ken Baum & Nicole Masson15 Minturn Street
Relief from the strict application of the Village Code Section 295-20C.2 for the construction of a new year patio at their home at 15 Minturn Street. Said property is in R-10 Zoning District and is also known as SBL: 4.20-10-10 on the Village Tax Maps.
Variance is sought for Paving in a required yard:
1. Paving in a required yard: Existing Deck – 250 sq. ft.; Proposed Patio – 650 sq. ft.; Required Max. – none allowed. {295-20C.2}; Variance required – 650 sq.ft.
»
Case No. 23-19 - Paul Gates
95 Circle Drive
Relief from the strict application of the Village Code Sections 295-68F.1(c) & 295-68F.2.(a).2 for a side yard accessory structure (free standing deck) at his property located at 95 Circle Drive. Said property is in R-10 Zoning District and is also known as SBL: 4.40-42-14 on the Village tax Maps.
Non-conformity details of the proposed Side Yard Accessory Structure are as follows:
1. Side yard setback: Existing – NA; Proposed – 2.75 ft.; Required Min. – 8 ft. {295-68F.1.c}; Variance required – 5.25 ft.
2. Development Coverage: Existing – 37.38%; Proposed – 41.64%; Required Max. – 35% {295-68F.2.a.2}; Variance required – 6.64%
Case No. 23-19
Paul Gates95 Circle Drive
Relief from the strict application of the Village Code Sections 295-68F.1(c) & 295-68F.2.(a).2 for a side yard accessory structure (free standing deck) at his property located at 95 Circle Drive. Said property is in R-10 Zoning District and is also known as SBL: 4.40-42-14 on the Village tax Maps.
Non-conformity details of the proposed Side Yard Accessory Structure are as follows:
1. Side yard setback: Existing – NA; Proposed – 2.75 ft.; Required Min. – 8 ft. {295-68F.1.c}; Variance required – 5.25 ft.
2. Development Coverage: Existing – 37.38%; Proposed – 41.64%; Required Max. – 35% {295-68F.2.a.2}; Variance required – 6.64%
»
Discussion Item - Proposed Local Law M of 2019 – Senior Housing Definitions
Discussion Item
Proposed Local Law M of 2019 – Senior Housing Definitions»
Approval of Minutes & Announcements -
Approval of Minutes
Regular Meetings – October 24, 2019
Announcements
Next Meeting Date – January 23, 2020
Approval of Minutes & Announcements
Approval of Minutes
Regular Meetings – October 24, 2019
Announcements
Next Meeting Date – January 23, 2020
© 2024 Swagit Productions, LLC